From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oBDAr6NO183464 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:53:06 -0600 Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 002241440EDE for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 02:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com (mx3-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.24]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6vXbj1buagX6SEpV for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 02:54:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:54:50 -0500 (EST) From: Boris Ranto Message-ID: <36980345.1112451292237690337.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1924340607.1111921292237137384.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Subject: Re: xfstests: ignore absolute address in filename in test case 237 MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com ----- "Christoph Hellwig" wrote: > I don't mind the patch, but what version of getfacl would produce an > absolute filename? The behavior was found in acl-2.2.39-6.el5: * setfacl -m 'user:test:rw' file setfacl: /mnt/tests/kernel/filesystems/xfs/xfstests/file: Operation not permitted * setfacl --version setfacl 2.2.39 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs