From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.webx.cz ([109.123.222.201]:47602 "EHLO mail.webx.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbdBBIfi (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2017 03:35:38 -0500 From: Libor =?utf-8?B?S2xlcMOhxI0=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: junk leaf attribute if count == 0 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:35:34 +0100 Message-ID: <371530044.aY76b0UHp3@libor-nb> In-Reply-To: <8a918652-f073-6c6e-0926-5a3b3f02e691@sandeen.net> References: <725190d9-6db0-4f6c-628b-76f2dca3071f@redhat.com> <3965431.22NzgsWbJj@libor-nb> <8a918652-f073-6c6e-0926-5a3b3f02e691@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , linux-xfs Hi, On středa 1. února 2017 16:49:49 CET Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 2/1/17 6:48 AM, Libor Klepáč wrote: > > Hello, > > we tried also on vps1 reported here in bottom of email > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg01728.html > > and vps3 from this email > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg02672.html > > > > Both came clean. Does it mean, that corruption was really only in memory > > and did not made it to disks? > > The point of the xfs_repair patch was to fix the problem > on-disk. Yes, i understand that > > I'm not sure what steps your machines have been through, so I > can't really speak to their situation, but assuming the repairs > below were with the patch in place, it appears that they are > clean now. > Ok, seems fair ;) > -Eric Thanks, Libor