From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oABM4vsn073121 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:04:57 -0600 Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6F363152249C for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:06:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FSBjJLrDSLAhABhN for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:06:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:06:19 +1100 (EST) From: Nathan Scott Message-ID: <373642228.32051289513179822.JavaMail.root@acxmail-au2.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: <1289491406.2280.7.camel@doink> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: aelder@sgi.com Cc: xfs ----- "Alex Elder" wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:42 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > ----- "Alex Elder" wrote: > . . . > > > I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time > > > but I seem to have missed them. In the future please > > > send this sort of thing to the list for review. > > > > They went to the list (thats where hch found 'em), perhaps > > caught in a spam trap at your end or something like that? > > OK, I think I found the problem. You are sending to > "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" and I'm not on that list. Nope, I'm using xfs@oss.sgi.com. I have a vague, distant memory of some list magic Russell setup years ago on oss, to remap linux-xfs@ (old school) to xfs@ (which was voted most popular name of the time). > I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@oss.sgi.com", which seems > to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing > list. Discussion about this is welcome, but I think > it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose. This discussion was had years ago, comes up every few years, & FWIW I don't really care where the list lives... think we all have more useful things to be doing. :) cheers. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs