[PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[nathans]

Update xfsprogs Debian maintainer annotation, bump version.
    
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>

diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION
index 58a77e2..e68ef43 100644
--- a/VERSION
+++ b/VERSION
@@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
 #
 PKG_MAJOR=3
 PKG_MINOR=1
-PKG_REVISION=3
+PKG_REVISION=4
 PKG_BUILD=1
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 24e5c20..1ce0b7e 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+xfsprogs (3.1.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release (32 projid resolution, fsr uses /proc/mounts)
+  * Annotate Debian packages as being team maintained now.
+  * Resolve Lenny upgrade issue with xfsdump (closes: #601988, #601710)
+
+ -- Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>  Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:39:04 +1100
+
 xfsprogs (3.1.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f429434..401cdab 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 Source: xfsprogs
 Section: admin
 Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
-Uploaders: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
+Maintainer: XFS Development Team <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
+Uploaders: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
 Build-Depends: uuid-dev, autoconf, debhelper (>= 5), gettext, libtool, libreadline5-dev, libblkid-dev (>= 2.17)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Homepage: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/
diff --git a/doc/CHANGES b/doc/CHANGES
index 4ae94d6..fc42eba 100644
--- a/doc/CHANGES
+++ b/doc/CHANGES
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xfsprogs-3.1.4 (9 November 2010)
+        - Add projid32bit handling to userspace, resolving type
+          sizing issues when dealing with 32 bit project ids.
+        - Make xfs_fsr use /proc/mounts if available.
+        - Annotate that Debian packages are group maintained.
+        - Fix a Debian packaging issue causing upgrade pain.
+
 xfsprogs-3.1.3 (26 August 2010)
         - Add xfs_io support for XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE
         - Fix depend targets.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:57:20PM +1100, nathans@aconex.com wrote:
> Update xfsprogs Debian maintainer annotation, bump version.
> ???? ??
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>

Looks good except for lots of weird chacaters which hopefully only
happen in the mail and not the actual patch.

Alex has various outstanding xfs_metadump updates, can you coordinate
the release with him, as it might be worth picking those up?

> diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION
> index 58a77e2..e68ef43 100644
> --- a/VERSION
> +++ b/VERSION
> @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
> ??#
> ??PKG_MAJOR=3
> ??PKG_MINOR=1
> -PKG_REVISION=3
> +PKG_REVISION=4
> ??PKG_BUILD=1
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index 24e5c20..1ce0b7e 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
> +xfsprogs (3.1.4) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> + ??* New upstream release (32 projid resolution, fsr uses /proc/mounts)
> + ??* Annotate Debian packages as being team maintained now.
> + ??* Resolve Lenny upgrade issue with xfsdump (closes: #601988, #601710)
> +
> + -- Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org> ??Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:39:04 +1100
> +
> ??xfsprogs (3.1.3) unstable; urgency=low
> ??
> ???? * New upstream release
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index f429434..401cdab 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> ??Source: xfsprogs
> ??Section: admin
> ??Priority: optional
> -Maintainer: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
> -Uploaders: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
> +Maintainer: XFS Development Team <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
> +Uploaders: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
> ??Build-Depends: uuid-dev, autoconf, debhelper (>= 5), gettext, libtool, libreadline5-dev, libblkid-dev (>= 2.17)
> ??Standards-Version: 3.9.1
> ??Homepage: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/
> diff --git a/doc/CHANGES b/doc/CHANGES
> index 4ae94d6..fc42eba 100644
> --- a/doc/CHANGES
> +++ b/doc/CHANGES
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +xfsprogs-3.1.4 (9 November 2010)
> +????????????????- Add projid32bit handling to userspace, resolving type
> +???????????????? ??sizing issues when dealing with 32 bit project ids.
> +????????????????- Make xfs_fsr use /proc/mounts if available.
> +????????????????- Annotate that Debian packages are group maintained.
> +????????????????- Fix a Debian packaging issue causing upgrade pain.
> +
> ??xfsprogs-3.1.3 (26 August 2010)
> ??????????????????- Add xfs_io support for XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE
> ??????????????????- Fix depend targets.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
---end quoted text---

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Nathan Scott]

----- "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:57:20PM +1100, nathans@aconex.com wrote:
> > Update xfsprogs Debian maintainer annotation, bump version.
> > ???? ??
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
> 
> Looks good except for lots of weird chacaters which hopefully only
> happen in the mail and not the actual patch.

Yeah, dopey mail client.

> Alex has various outstanding xfs_metadump updates, can you coordinate
> the release with him, as it might be worth picking those up?

No worries - do you have an ETA there Alex?

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Alex Elder]

On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:53 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> No worries - do you have an ETA there Alex?

I wanted to update them and re-post and get
an actual review this time.

I can get that done with a few hours effort.
What is your time frame?  I'm in the middle of a
few things right now but can move this to the
front of my queue if you're short on time.

					-Alex



_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Nathan Scott]

Hi Alex,

----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:53 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > No worries - do you have an ETA there Alex?
> 
> I wanted to update them and re-post and get
> an actual review this time.
> 
> I can get that done with a few hours effort.
> What is your time frame?  I'm in the middle of a
> few things right now but can move this to the
> front of my queue if you're short on time.

Ideally we'd get a release out asap for Debian folks,
as the upgrade issue is biting quite a few people.  If
the metadump stuff needs more time, doing a subsequent
release with that is a fine option too... lemme know.
Since Debian is moving toward a (distro) release, the
less change we're putting into this release, the better
- so, my vote would be to hold off on further changes
till next time, but up to you.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Alex Elder]

On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:53 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > No worries - do you have an ETA there Alex?
> > 
> > I wanted to update them and re-post and get
> > an actual review this time.
> > 
> > I can get that done with a few hours effort.
> > What is your time frame?  I'm in the middle of a
> > few things right now but can move this to the
> > front of my queue if you're short on time.
> 
> Ideally we'd get a release out asap for Debian folks,
> as the upgrade issue is biting quite a few people.  If
> the metadump stuff needs more time, doing a subsequent
> release with that is a fine option too... lemme know.
> Since Debian is moving toward a (distro) release, the
> less change we're putting into this release, the better
> - so, my vote would be to hold off on further changes
> till next time, but up to you.

Fine with me.  The metadump stuff doesn't need much time
but I don't mind marking a release without it.  Push your
changes to the xfsprogs-dev tree and I'll put together
the release first thing tomorrow.

I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time
but I seem to have missed them.  In the future please
send this sort of thing to the list for review.

					-Alex

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Nathan Scott]

----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > ...
> > - so, my vote would be to hold off on further changes
> > till next time, but up to you.
> 
> Fine with me.  The metadump stuff doesn't need much time
> but I don't mind marking a release without it.  Push your
> changes to the xfsprogs-dev tree and I'll put together
> the release first thing tomorrow.

OK, will get that done tonight (local time, in ~5hrs or so).

> I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time
> but I seem to have missed them.  In the future please
> send this sort of thing to the list for review.

They went to the list (thats where hch found 'em), perhaps
caught in a spam trap at your end or something like that?

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Alex Elder]

On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:42 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:
. . .
> > I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time
> > but I seem to have missed them.  In the future please
> > send this sort of thing to the list for review.
> 
> They went to the list (thats where hch found 'em), perhaps
> caught in a spam trap at your end or something like that?

OK, I think I found the problem.  You are sending to
"linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" and I'm not on that list.
I wasn't even aware of it.  Something in majordomo
still shows Jim Mostek as having some sort of
ownership for that list (which would be at least 10
year old information).

I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@oss.sgi.com", which seems
to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing
list.  Discussion about this is welcome, but I think
it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose.

					-Alex


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:03:26AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> OK, I think I found the problem.  You are sending to
> "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" and I'm not on that list.
> I wasn't even aware of it.  Something in majordomo
> still shows Jim Mostek as having some sort of
> ownership for that list (which would be at least 10
> year old information).
> 
> I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@oss.sgi.com", which seems
> to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing
> list.  Discussion about this is welcome, but I think
> it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose.

Yes, we should have just one list.  My preference would be
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org as vger doesn't have the various issues
of the SGI mail setup, but the important bit is to concentrate on one.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Nathan Scott]

----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:42 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:
> . . .
> > > I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time
> > > but I seem to have missed them.  In the future please
> > > send this sort of thing to the list for review.
> > 
> > They went to the list (thats where hch found 'em), perhaps
> > caught in a spam trap at your end or something like that?
> 
> OK, I think I found the problem.  You are sending to
> "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" and I'm not on that list.

Nope, I'm using xfs@oss.sgi.com.  I have a vague, distant
memory of some list magic Russell setup years ago on oss,
to remap linux-xfs@ (old school) to xfs@ (which was voted
most popular name of the time).

> I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@oss.sgi.com", which seems
> to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing
> list.  Discussion about this is welcome, but I think
> it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose.

This discussion was had years ago, comes up every few years,
& FWIW I don't really care where the list lives... think we
all have more useful things to be doing. :)

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[nathans]

----- "Nathan Scott" <nathans@aconex.com> wrote:

> ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > ...
> > > - so, my vote would be to hold off on further changes
> > > till next time, but up to you.
> > 
> > Fine with me.  The metadump stuff doesn't need much time
> > but I don't mind marking a release without it.  Push your
> > changes to the xfsprogs-dev tree and I'll put together
> > the release first thing tomorrow.
> 
> OK, will get that done tonight (local time, in ~5hrs or so).

Merged, tagged, pushed to kernel.org and Debian servers.  Lemme
know if you'd like me to spin up a source tarball to put on ftp
area of oss.sgi.com, etc, too.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Alex Elder]

On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 21:24 +1100, nathans@aconex.com wrote:
> ----- "Nathan Scott" <nathans@aconex.com> wrote:
> 
> > ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > ...
> > > > - so, my vote would be to hold off on further changes
> > > > till next time, but up to you.
> > > 
> > > Fine with me.  The metadump stuff doesn't need much time
> > > but I don't mind marking a release without it.  Push your
> > > changes to the xfsprogs-dev tree and I'll put together
> > > the release first thing tomorrow.
> > 
> > OK, will get that done tonight (local time, in ~5hrs or so).
> 
> Merged, tagged, pushed to kernel.org and Debian servers.  Lemme
> know if you'd like me to spin up a source tarball to put on ftp
> area of oss.sgi.com, etc, too.

You apparently didn't use the release script.  I'm not
going to change anything though--I expect a new version
should be tagged once I get the metadump changes in and
that will be pretty soon anyway.

I'll update the git tree on oss.sgi.com and will push a
tar file out to oss.sgi.com, you don't have to.

Thanks.

					-Alex

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Nathan Scott]

----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@sgi.com> wrote:

> You apparently didn't use the release script.  I'm not
> going to change anything though--I expect a new version

Ah, yes, forgot about that script.  But, I did everything in it,
manually, so no harm done I guess.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs