From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Subject: Re: How capacious and well-indexed are ext4, xfs and btrfs directories?
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 23:31:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4169583.1621981910@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6E4DE257-4220-4B5B-B3D0-B67C7BC69BB5@dilger.ca>
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> wrote:
> As described elsewhere in the thread, allowing concurrent create and unlink
> in a directory (rename probably not needed) would be invaluable for scaling
> multi-threaded workloads. Neil Brown posted a prototype patch to add this
> to the VFS for NFS:
Actually, one thing I'm looking at is using vfs_tmpfile() to create a new file
(or a replacement file when invalidation is required) and then using
vfs_link() to attach directory entries in the background (possibly using
vfs_link() with AT_LINK_REPLACE[1] instead of unlink+link).
Any thoughts on how that might scale? vfs_tmpfile() doesn't appear to require
the directory inode lock. I presume the directory is required for security
purposes in addition to being a way to specify the target filesystem.
David
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/cover.1580251857.git.osandov@fb.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 15:06 How capacious and well-indexed are ext4, xfs and btrfs directories? David Howells
2021-05-17 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-17 23:40 ` Chris Mason
2021-05-18 7:24 ` David Howells
2021-05-19 8:00 ` Avi Kivity
2021-05-19 12:57 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 14:13 ` Avi Kivity
2021-05-21 5:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-05-23 5:51 ` Josh Triplett
2021-05-25 4:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-25 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-25 21:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-05-25 21:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-05-25 22:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-25 22:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-05-26 0:24 ` Chris Mason
2021-06-22 0:50 ` Josh Triplett
2021-05-25 22:31 ` David Howells [this message]
2021-05-25 22:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-05-26 0:00 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4169583.1621981910@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox