public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hch@infradead.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfs: Fix "use after free" of intent items
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:55:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4344588.3YHvTizCoe@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180111125223.10727-1-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thursday, January 11, 2018 6:22:23 PM IST Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> generic/388 can cause the following "use after free" error to occur,
> 
>  =============================================================================
>  BUG xfs_efi_item (Not tainted): Poison overwritten
>  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
>  INFO: 0x00000000292c4bd4-0x00000000292c4bd4. First byte 0x6a instead of 0x6b
>  INFO: Allocated in .kmem_zone_alloc+0xcc/0x190 age=79 cpu=0 pid=12436
>  	.__slab_alloc+0x54/0x80
>  	.kmem_cache_alloc+0x124/0x350
>  	.kmem_zone_alloc+0xcc/0x190
>  	.xfs_efi_init+0x48/0xf0
>  	.xfs_extent_free_create_intent+0x40/0x130
>  	.xfs_defer_intake_work+0x74/0x1e0
>  	.xfs_defer_finish+0xac/0x5c0
>  	.xfs_itruncate_extents+0x170/0x590
>  	.xfs_inactive_truncate+0xcc/0x170
>  	.xfs_inactive+0x1d8/0x2f0
>  	.xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0xe4/0x3d0
>  	.destroy_inode+0x68/0xb0
>  	.do_unlinkat+0x1e8/0x390
>  	system_call+0x58/0x6c
>  INFO: Freed in .xfs_efi_item_free+0x44/0x80 age=79 cpu=0 pid=12436
>  	.kmem_cache_free+0x120/0x2b0
>  	.xfs_efi_item_free+0x44/0x80
>  	.xfs_trans_free_items+0xd4/0x130
>  	.__xfs_trans_commit+0xd0/0x350
>  	.xfs_trans_roll+0x4c/0x90
>  	.xfs_defer_trans_roll+0xa4/0x2b0
>  	.xfs_defer_finish+0xb8/0x5c0
>  	.xfs_itruncate_extents+0x170/0x590
>  	.xfs_inactive_truncate+0xcc/0x170
>  	.xfs_inactive+0x1d8/0x2f0
>  	.xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0xe4/0x3d0
>  	.destroy_inode+0x68/0xb0
>  	.do_unlinkat+0x1e8/0x390
>  	system_call+0x58/0x6c
> 
> This happens due to the following interaction,
> 1. xfs_defer_finish() creates "extent free" intent item and adds it to the
>    list at xfs_trans->t_items.
> 2. xfs_defer_trans_roll() invokes __xfs_trans_commit(). Here, if the
>    XFS_MOUNT_FS_SHUTDOWN flag is set, we invoke io_unlock() operation of the
>    corresponding log item. For "extent free" log items xfs_efi_item_unlock()
>    gets invoked which frees the xfs_efi_log_item.
> 3. xfs_defer_trans_roll() then invokes xfs_defer_trans_abort(). Since the
>    xfs_defer_pending->dfp_intent is still set to the "extent free" intent
>    item, we invoke xfs_extent_free_abort_intent(). This accesses the
>    previously freed xfs_efi_log_item to decrement the ref count.
> 
> This commit fixes the bug by changing xfs_efi_item_unlock() to invoke
> xfs_efi_release() instead of xfs_efi_item_free(). The xfs_efi_log_item gets
> freed when xfs_extent_free_abort_intent() invokes xfs_efi_release() once again
> i.e. its refcount becomes zero and hence xfs_efi_item_free() is invoked.
> 
> Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
> The above mentioned "use after free" occurs with other log items.
> (e.g. xfs_rui_item). If the below fix is found to be correct, I will
> apply it to other affected log items as well and post a new patch.
> 

I am assuming that the refcount for xfs_efi_item is set to 2 to account
for,
1. Linking the corresponding log descriptor item to the transaction's
   t_items list.
2. For storing the pointer to the intent item at 
   xfs_defer_pending->dfp_intent.

Please let me know if my assumption is incorrect.

-- 
chandan


  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-11 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-11 12:52 [RFC PATCH] xfs: Fix "use after free" of intent items Chandan Rajendra
2018-01-11 13:25 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2018-01-12 15:02 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 13:55   ` Chandan Rajendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4344588.3YHvTizCoe@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox