From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hch@infradead.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfs: Fix "use after free" of intent items
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:55:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4344588.3YHvTizCoe@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180111125223.10727-1-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thursday, January 11, 2018 6:22:23 PM IST Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> generic/388 can cause the following "use after free" error to occur,
>
> =============================================================================
> BUG xfs_efi_item (Not tainted): Poison overwritten
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
> INFO: 0x00000000292c4bd4-0x00000000292c4bd4. First byte 0x6a instead of 0x6b
> INFO: Allocated in .kmem_zone_alloc+0xcc/0x190 age=79 cpu=0 pid=12436
> .__slab_alloc+0x54/0x80
> .kmem_cache_alloc+0x124/0x350
> .kmem_zone_alloc+0xcc/0x190
> .xfs_efi_init+0x48/0xf0
> .xfs_extent_free_create_intent+0x40/0x130
> .xfs_defer_intake_work+0x74/0x1e0
> .xfs_defer_finish+0xac/0x5c0
> .xfs_itruncate_extents+0x170/0x590
> .xfs_inactive_truncate+0xcc/0x170
> .xfs_inactive+0x1d8/0x2f0
> .xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0xe4/0x3d0
> .destroy_inode+0x68/0xb0
> .do_unlinkat+0x1e8/0x390
> system_call+0x58/0x6c
> INFO: Freed in .xfs_efi_item_free+0x44/0x80 age=79 cpu=0 pid=12436
> .kmem_cache_free+0x120/0x2b0
> .xfs_efi_item_free+0x44/0x80
> .xfs_trans_free_items+0xd4/0x130
> .__xfs_trans_commit+0xd0/0x350
> .xfs_trans_roll+0x4c/0x90
> .xfs_defer_trans_roll+0xa4/0x2b0
> .xfs_defer_finish+0xb8/0x5c0
> .xfs_itruncate_extents+0x170/0x590
> .xfs_inactive_truncate+0xcc/0x170
> .xfs_inactive+0x1d8/0x2f0
> .xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0xe4/0x3d0
> .destroy_inode+0x68/0xb0
> .do_unlinkat+0x1e8/0x390
> system_call+0x58/0x6c
>
> This happens due to the following interaction,
> 1. xfs_defer_finish() creates "extent free" intent item and adds it to the
> list at xfs_trans->t_items.
> 2. xfs_defer_trans_roll() invokes __xfs_trans_commit(). Here, if the
> XFS_MOUNT_FS_SHUTDOWN flag is set, we invoke io_unlock() operation of the
> corresponding log item. For "extent free" log items xfs_efi_item_unlock()
> gets invoked which frees the xfs_efi_log_item.
> 3. xfs_defer_trans_roll() then invokes xfs_defer_trans_abort(). Since the
> xfs_defer_pending->dfp_intent is still set to the "extent free" intent
> item, we invoke xfs_extent_free_abort_intent(). This accesses the
> previously freed xfs_efi_log_item to decrement the ref count.
>
> This commit fixes the bug by changing xfs_efi_item_unlock() to invoke
> xfs_efi_release() instead of xfs_efi_item_free(). The xfs_efi_log_item gets
> freed when xfs_extent_free_abort_intent() invokes xfs_efi_release() once again
> i.e. its refcount becomes zero and hence xfs_efi_item_free() is invoked.
>
> Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> The above mentioned "use after free" occurs with other log items.
> (e.g. xfs_rui_item). If the below fix is found to be correct, I will
> apply it to other affected log items as well and post a new patch.
>
I am assuming that the refcount for xfs_efi_item is set to 2 to account
for,
1. Linking the corresponding log descriptor item to the transaction's
t_items list.
2. For storing the pointer to the intent item at
xfs_defer_pending->dfp_intent.
Please let me know if my assumption is incorrect.
--
chandan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-11 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-11 12:52 [RFC PATCH] xfs: Fix "use after free" of intent items Chandan Rajendra
2018-01-11 13:25 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2018-01-12 15:02 ` Brian Foster
2018-01-16 13:55 ` Chandan Rajendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4344588.3YHvTizCoe@localhost.localdomain \
--to=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox