From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avalanche.hickorytech.net (smtp.hickorytech.net [216.114.192.16]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k6K1v7DW031656 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:12 -0700 Message-ID: <44BF19DA.9060403@mnsu.edu> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:51:22 -0500 From: Jeffrey Hundstad MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 References: <67dc30140607190717r57ed2fe5w719dcca896110d8@mail.gmail.com> <44BE48D5.7020107@mnsu.edu> <20060720090109.F1947140@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060720090109.F1947140@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Nathan Scott Cc: Mattias Hedenskog , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Nathan Scott wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:59:33AM -0500, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: > >> I did try the xfs_repair 2.8.4 for a volume running on 2.6.17.4 and it >> annihilated the volume. This volume was not showing signs of crashing. >> So... I guess I would certainly not run xfs_repair unless there is good >> reason. >> > > Erm, wha..? Can you expand on "annihilated" a bit? (please send > me the full xfs_repair output if you still have it). > Nathan Scott, I'm very sorry; I don't have the output anymore. By annihilated I mean that there were several directories trees that /didn't work/. If you tried to cd into the directory or take a directory listing... or used a file that you knew was in these certain directories then you'd get pages of debug message to the console; and no usable data. I re-ran xfs_repair and retried several times but the condition never seemed to improve or get worse for that matter. I /incorrectly/ figured it was a known issue or I'd have saved the output. Sorry again. -- Jeffrey Hundstad