public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert <robert@miraclelinux.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Robert <robert@miraclelinux.com>
Subject: Re: Unresolved generic_file_write_nolock
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:37:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C86D20.2040908@miraclelinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44C7508A.5010500@miraclelinux.com>

Hi

I had solved this problem. I will describe in this email.

At frist, the error message for this issue is as below:

Loading xfs.o module
/lib/xfs.o : unresolved symbol generic_file_write_nolock
ERROR : /bin/insmod exited abnormally
creating block devices
mounting root filesystem
mount : error 19 mounting xfs
.........

I changed all

#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2.4.22) || defined\
(KERNEL_HAS_NEW_O_DIRECT)

in fs/xfs/linux/xfs_lrw.c to

#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2.4.21) || defined\
(KERNEL_HAS_NEW_O_DIRECT)

and rebuild, install kernel. Everything goes well now.

Please comment.

Thank you
Robert


Robert wrote:
> Hi XFS guys
> 
> I like to use XFS but I have a compile question for
> 
> xfs-modules-fs-modules-1.3.3-2.4.21-27.0.2.EL.sgi9.src.rpm
> 
> which is download from ftp://oss.sgi/com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL3/
> 
> 
> I compiled it with kernel-2.4.21-37.EL with normal steps. Everything
> is ok and then I run the command installkernel but got below error 
> message like this:
> 
> depmod  ..... xfs.o
> Unresolved symble : generic_file_write_nolock
> 
> Then I had tried to find this function in 2.4.21-37EL and mainstream
> kernel-2.4.32, but it does not exist in them. I refer to SPEC file
> and found this generic_file_write_nolock() already deleted at
> linux-2.4.21-odirect.patch, no more exist. Even in the old kernel
> 2.4.21-20.EL, I can not find it.
> 
> This generic_file_write_nolock() is used in xfs/linux/xfs_lrw.c line 745
> 
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2.4.22) || defined\ 
> (KERNEL_HAS_NEW_O_DIRECT)
>    :
>    :
>    :
> #else
> retry :
>      if (ioflags & IO_ISDIRECT) {
>            xfs_inval_cached_pages(vp, io, *offset, 1, 1);
>      }
>      ret = generic_file_write_nolock(file, buf, size, offset);
> #endif
> 
> Logically, the #if KERNEL_VERSION_CODE is smaller than 2.4.22.
> The generic_file_write_nolock should be included by C preprocessor.
> So, could you guys tell me why the uploaded RPM:
> 
> xfs-modules-smp-1.3.3-2.4.21_27.0.2.EL.sgi9_sgi2.i686.rpm
> 
> does not included this function, generic_file_write_nolock?
> 
> and Did you compile the xfs-modules with the same kernel
> 2.4.21-27.0.2.EL.sgi9_sgi2?
> 
> I can not find generic_file_write_nolock in the System.map of the
> its uploaded RPM :
> 
>  kernel-smp-2.4.21-27.0.2.EL.sgi9.i686.rpm
> 
> This issue take my time for about 1 week and still not solved.
> Any comment is thankfully.
> 
> Best Regards
> Robert
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2006-07-27  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-26 11:22 Unresolved generic_file_write_nolock Robert
2006-07-27  7:37 ` Robert [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44C86D20.2040908@miraclelinux.com \
    --to=robert@miraclelinux.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox