public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: review: fix bulkstat error detection logic
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:40:35 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C9A353.1050702@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060726102406.I2118045@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>

Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> An earlier patch to remove bulkstat verbosity in debug kernels
> changed the xfs_itobp logic slightly, such that we no longer do
> the first stage of buffer checking there.  Turns out this isn't
> the right fix, we need to do that check still, and pass out the
> error code to bulkstat still, otherwise we either trip up logic
> in later debug code, or pass out success incorrectly.
> 
> This fixes that up, and is the last bulkstat change I have for
> awhile. :)  Its error handling is correct once more, its a fair
> bit quicker, and no more debug-kernel console spam - hooray!
> 
> cheers.
> 

Looks reasonable.
So you still do the inode buffer validation but we don't print out
a corruption error msg and we return EINVAL instead of EFSCORRUPTED.
Can we not be bulkstat'ing over inodes with reasonable numbers/locations but
the inode data on disk is just corrupted?
(I missed looking at the original patch)

(Interesting how previously you set ni to 0 in the XFS_IMAP_BULKSTAT
case and yet in the loop which would then never iterate (0<0=F),
you test for XFS_IMAP_BULKSTAT :)

--Tim

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-28  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-26  0:24 review: fix bulkstat error detection logic Nathan Scott
2006-07-28  5:40 ` Timothy Shimmin [this message]
2006-07-28  5:45   ` Nathan Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44C9A353.1050702@sgi.com \
    --to=tes@sgi.com \
    --cc=nathans@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox