From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from service.eng.exegy.net (68-191-203-42.static.stls.mo.charter.com [68.191.203.42]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k73LehDW014918 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:40:43 -0700 Message-ID: <44D26D3E.5010708@exegy.com> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:40:14 -0500 From: Dave Lloyd MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN References: <20060803143301.51757.qmail@web31704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060803143301.51757.qmail@web31704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Heilige Gheist Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Heilige Gheist wrote: > Is there a way to prevent and/or detect concurrent mount of same XFS > SAN-based partition from several nodes? > I had to fsck a filesystem losing some data after two nodes happily > mounted a filesystem from same SAN-based partition at the same time and > wrote into it. > Thanks! > > --alan > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > I think that the generally accepted way is to zone at the switch or the storage array. -- Dave Lloyd Test Engineer, Exegy, Inc. 314.450.5342 dlloyd@exegy.com