From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k7UJGVDW021789
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:16:34 -0700
Message-ID: <44F5E3DB.70802@sandeen.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:15:39 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: catch22: xfs_repair fails, tells me to mount, which fails
References: <20060830082411.GA9986@lapse.madduck.net> <44F597F9.6020803@agami.com> <20060830141548.GA21325@piper.madduck.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060830141548.GA21325@piper.madduck.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Cc: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

martin f krafft wrote:

> Btw: there's the xfs and linux-xfs mailing list, and I am confused
> about whether they're separate or merged, and which one I should be
> using. If you have any input, I'd love to hear it.

xfs@ is the current one, linux-xfs@ is the old one, and is aliased to 
xfs@ (there was probably a post about this when xfs@ was created).

-Eric