From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k8M2OnaG011981 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:24:49 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id F023FD10E75E for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4513493F.8090005@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:23:59 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch References: <45131334.6050803@sandeen.net> <45134472.7080002@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <45134472.7080002@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Timothy Shimmin Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , xfs mailing list Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Looked at your patch and then at our xfs code in the tree and > the existing code is different than what yours is based on. > I then noticed in the logs Nathan has actually made changes for this: > > ---------------------------- > revision 1.254 > date: 2006/07/17 10:46:05; author: nathans; state: Exp; lines: +20 -5 > modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26565a > Update XFS for i_blksize removal from generic inode structure > ---------------------------- > I even reviewed the change (and I don't remember it - getting old). > > I looked at the mods scheduled for 2.6.19 and this is one of them. > > So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the > one above). Ah, ok, thanks guys. Should have checked CVS I guess. -Eric