From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k8MNJpaG007055 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:19:51 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E1EEAD110A22 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <45146F76.3010301@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:19:18 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch References: <45131334.6050803@sandeen.net> <45134472.7080002@sgi.com> <20060922161040.609286fa.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060922161040.609286fa.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Andrew Morton Cc: Timothy Shimmin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , xfs mailing list Andrew Morton wrote: >> So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the >> one above). >> > > eh? Eric's patch is based on -mm, which includes the XFS git tree. If I > go and merge the inode-diet patches from -mm, XFS gets broken until you > guys merge the above mystery patch. (I prefer to merge the -mm patches > after all the git trees have gone, but sometimes maintainers dawdle and I > get bored of waiting). > > Is git://oss.sgi.com:8090/nathans/xfs-2.6 obsolete, or are you hiding stuff > from me? ;) > > well it's in cvs: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.254&r2=text&tr2=1.253&f=h but I'm too lazy to check git on a friday evening. :) Well, sgi-guys, I'll let you sort out which patch you want. Sorry for not checking cvs first! -Eric