From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k8SFHDaG001619 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:17:14 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2850A462FC9 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <451BE74F.3030205@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:16:31 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: about performace References: <20060928065113.70796.qmail@web8511.mail.in.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928065113.70796.qmail@web8511.mail.in.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: nagesh kollu Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com nagesh kollu wrote: > hi,, > i'm new to xfs ..i want to know the performance details of xfs.. > how much time it will take to write /read ...can anyone done this on ARM processor...the block size is 2^n only in xfs ..but for video streaming the incoming packet is 188 bytes .the sector size is 512 ...so the i/o buffer size is 188*512 ...how can we do this in xfs....cany anyone send the xfs performance details.. It sounds like you have a very specific environment that would be best tested and evaluated by... you :) Yes, the blocksizes are powers of two, but of course you can do any arbitrary sized write, if that's what you're asking. -Eric