public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Apostolov <vapo@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs vs. lockdep
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:36:09 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <452ADCE9.2070402@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452A8DE2.4000608@sandeen.net>

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> FC6 kernels are oopsing when lockdep & memory debugging are turned on,
> looks like due to this code:
>
> xfs_ireclaim(xfs_inode_t *ip)
> {
>    ...
>         /*
>          * Here we do a spurious inode lock in order to coordinate with
>          * xfs_sync().  This is because xfs_sync() references the inodes
>          * in the mount list without taking references on the corresponding
>          * vnodes.  We make that OK here by ensuring that we wait until
>          * the inode is unlocked in xfs_sync() before we go ahead and
>          * free it.  We get both the regular lock and the io lock because
>          * the xfs_sync() code may need to drop the regular one but will
>          * still hold the io lock.
>          */
>         xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> ...
>         /*
>          * Free all memory associated with the inode.
>          */
>         xfs_idestroy(ip);
> }
>
> So, lock & free.  This frees memory that lockdep is still pointing to,
> and tries to use later.
>
> Calling xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL); just before
> xfs_idestroy seems to solve it, but is this safe...?
>
> -Eric
>
>   
Hi Eric,

Could you please provide some more information. What kernel, test case 
and call stack at the time of the crash.

Thanks,
Vlad

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-09 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-09 17:58 xfs vs. lockdep Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 23:36 ` Vlad Apostolov [this message]
2006-10-10  3:06   ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-10  3:23     ` Vlad Apostolov
2006-10-10  0:47 ` David Chinner
2006-10-10  1:45   ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-10-10  2:21     ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-10  4:55       ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-10-10  2:25   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=452ADCE9.2070402@sgi.com \
    --to=vapo@sgi.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox