From: Vlad Apostolov <vapo@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs vs. lockdep
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:36:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452ADCE9.2070402@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452A8DE2.4000608@sandeen.net>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> FC6 kernels are oopsing when lockdep & memory debugging are turned on,
> looks like due to this code:
>
> xfs_ireclaim(xfs_inode_t *ip)
> {
> ...
> /*
> * Here we do a spurious inode lock in order to coordinate with
> * xfs_sync(). This is because xfs_sync() references the inodes
> * in the mount list without taking references on the corresponding
> * vnodes. We make that OK here by ensuring that we wait until
> * the inode is unlocked in xfs_sync() before we go ahead and
> * free it. We get both the regular lock and the io lock because
> * the xfs_sync() code may need to drop the regular one but will
> * still hold the io lock.
> */
> xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> ...
> /*
> * Free all memory associated with the inode.
> */
> xfs_idestroy(ip);
> }
>
> So, lock & free. This frees memory that lockdep is still pointing to,
> and tries to use later.
>
> Calling xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL); just before
> xfs_idestroy seems to solve it, but is this safe...?
>
> -Eric
>
>
Hi Eric,
Could you please provide some more information. What kernel, test case
and call stack at the time of the crash.
Thanks,
Vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-09 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-09 17:58 xfs vs. lockdep Eric Sandeen
2006-10-09 23:36 ` Vlad Apostolov [this message]
2006-10-10 3:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-10 3:23 ` Vlad Apostolov
2006-10-10 0:47 ` David Chinner
2006-10-10 1:45 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-10-10 2:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-10-10 4:55 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-10-10 2:25 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452ADCE9.2070402@sgi.com \
--to=vapo@sgi.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox