From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k9A37haG010652 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:07:44 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4601048BD11 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <452B0E53.2070507@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:06:59 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs vs. lockdep References: <452A8DE2.4000608@sandeen.net> <452ADCE9.2070402@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <452ADCE9.2070402@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Vlad Apostolov Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Vlad Apostolov wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Could you please provide some more information. What kernel, test case > and call stack at the time of the crash. > > Thanks, > Vlad Vlad, for reference, this was a very recent FC6 test kernel, which has lockdep & slab debugging on. Oopsing is as simple as mounting & umounting. It dies in lockdep code. See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209062 -Eric