From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:26:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kA63Q0aG001490 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:26:01 -0800 Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C6FA7D1BD719 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:25:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <454EAB19.6060901@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:25:13 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: mount failed after xfs_growfs beyond 16 TB References: <20061102172608.GA27769@pc51072.physik.uni-regensburg.de> <20061103004142.GI8394166@melbourne.sgi.com> <454B5833.9030008@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Timothy Shimmin Cc: David Chinner , Christian Guggenberger , xfs@oss.sgi.com Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Good idea, Eric. > I've created a pv. > I noticed this was taken from xfs_mount_validate_sb() for the dblocks test. yep > I guess it would be nice to abstract this test in a macro for use in > multiple places. yep, it'd just need to be refactored a bit to support data only & rt only (for growfs), while mount wants to check both at the same time. -Eric > > Cheers, > Tim.