From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kADI7jaG007585 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:07:47 -0800 Received: from evaldomino.Falconstor.com (mail1.falconstor.com [216.223.47.230]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CDD52D1D1CBA for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:40:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4558AE11.2030108@falconstor.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:40:33 -0500 From: "Geir A. Myrestrand" Reply-To: geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Update for the RHEL4 XFS module? References: <455893BE.4010208@moving-picture.com> <45589A06.7040503@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <45589A06.7040503@sandeen.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: James Pearson , xfs@oss.sgi.com Eric Sandeen wrote: > James Pearson wrote: >> The RHEL4 XFS module code at >> is now about a year old. >> >> Is there any chance that it could be updated with something based on >> more recent code? >> > > Funny you should ask, I just started looking at this last night :) > > It was originally based on the SLES9 xfs code; my plan is to simply > update it to the latest sles9 xfs codebase, as that has been tended to > with a goal of stability by the fine folks at sgi.... so, no > bleeding-edge xfs for now (I don't particularly want to backport 2.6.18 > xfs code to 2.6.9....) > Eric, please notify us via the list when it has been updated. I would like this module updated too... Thanks! -- Geir A. Myrestrand