From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:45:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kAMFioaG006557 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:44:51 -0800 Message-ID: <45647042.2040604@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:44:02 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches References: <455CB54F.8080901@sandeen.net> <455CE1E3.7020703@sandeen.net> <45612621.5010404@sandeen.net> <45627A4D.3020502@sandeen.net> <1164157336.19915.43.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com> <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local> In-Reply-To: <5A1AC29043EE33BEB778198A@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Timothy Shimmin Cc: Russell Cattelan , xfs@oss.sgi.com Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Thanks, Russell. > > I've been going thru the irc and just started looking at the patch. > I'll get back to you about it tomorrow. > > I agree it would be good to have the fixed forkoff for data btree roots > as the first fix. And look into redoing the btree root for a later change. My only question is, how much does this defeat the purpose of attr2? -Eric