From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from randymail-a6.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-119.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kAU1c8aG018434
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:38:09 -0800
Message-ID: <456E35CA.2000601@delusion.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:37:14 -0800
From: Deanan <delusion@delusion.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: inode64 workaround
References: <200611290027.AA04740@TNESG9305.tnes.nec.co.jp> <1164838985.4992.30.camel@edge> <456E1B08.7090802@delusion.com> <456E2A30.4010101@melbourne.sgi.com> <456E2D0E.2000007@delusion.com> <456E30A5.6080109@melbourne.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <456E30A5.6080109@melbourne.sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: chatz@melbourne.sgi.com
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

Thanks. Unfortunately 2.6.9 doesn't have it. :(

> This is a sysctl, see sysctl(8).
>
> It was introduced to XFS in October 2004, I'm not sure if it made 2.6.9.
>
> If this doesn't help a little then I'm unsure why you think that inode64 is
> going to solve your problem?
>
> David
>