From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:21:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from evaldomino.Falconstor.com (mail1.falconstor.com [216.223.47.230])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kB7IL9aG032631
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:21:10 -0800
Message-ID: <45785B3F.7010505@falconstor.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:19:43 -0500
From: "Geir A. Myrestrand" <geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com>
Reply-To: geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
References: <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net>
In-Reply-To: <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Did you have this problem on the previous version?

Not sure if this occur with the older XFS modules, because I haven't 
tested it.

-- 

Geir A. Myrestrand