From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kB7MJaaG003140 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:19:37 -0800 Message-ID: <45789341.6000809@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:18:41 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms References: <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net> <45787ED4.5070801@falconstor.com> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@falconstor.com> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> <457892BB.1000203@falconstor.com> In-Reply-To: <457892BB.1000203@falconstor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, nscott@aconex.com Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: > Nathan Scott wrote: >> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:51 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: >>> Sorry Nathan, but I'm not sure I understand what you refer to with >>> "test out the latest" --are you referring to the kernel or XFS? >> Yes. :) Current mainline kernels, or CVS from oss.sgi.com would >> have this fix I'm thinking of. > > Thanks for the "clarification"... ;-) > > I'll try to update the XFS code first, hopefully it won't break too many > of the patches Eric had in his source RPM...but I will try to correct > them if they fail to apply cleanly... > > I'll keep you posted. > I would just get kernel-2.6.19 and run the test, see if it's fixed upstream, don't worry about merging & munging xfs code from one place o another... -Eric