From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:27:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from evaldomino.Falconstor.com (mail1.falconstor.com [216.223.47.230]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kB7MRLaG004613 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:27:22 -0800 Message-ID: <457894DF.70603@falconstor.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:25:35 -0500 From: "Geir A. Myrestrand" Reply-To: geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms References: <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net> <45787ED4.5070801@falconstor.com> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@falconstor.com> <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> <457892BB.1000203@falconstor.com> <45789341.6000809@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <45789341.6000809@sandeen.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: Eric Sandeen , nscott@aconex.com Eric Sandeen wrote: > > I would just get kernel-2.6.19 and run the test, see if it's fixed > upstream, don't worry about merging & munging xfs code from one place o > another... > > -Eric I have SLES 10 (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) installed on the same box, the kernel is 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp. Would it be worth checking that one first? -- Geir A. Myrestrand