From: Francesco Degrassi <francesco.degrassi@emaze.net>
To: iusty@k1024.org
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Possible performance problem introduced between kernel 2.6.15 and 2.6.17 on xfs code
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:56:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459394EA.3000304@emaze.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061227180542.GA6888@teal.hq.k1024.org>
Hi Iustin,
i tried and it and indeed the performance problem does not manifest if i
mount the xfs filesystem with the -o nobarrier option. Seems like we are
a little bit closer to the real problem now.
The code in gnomevfs-copy calls fadvice POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED (in
gnome_vfs_forget_cache) and disabling this behaviour gets back normal
performance, so it has something to do with that.
Thanks for your help
Francesco
Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 07:03:45PM +0100, Francesco Degrassi wrote:
>> I tried ext2, ext3, jfs, reiser3, vfat and the problem does not show up.
>> Anyway i discovered that if i create a regular file in an XFS partition,
>> create an XFS filesystem on it as if it was a regular block device, and
>> mount it with the loop device, the problem does NOT manifest.
>> So it seems to affect XFS filesystems on regular block devices only ?
>> I'm confused.
>
> This is probably not related, but I remember that barriers were added
> sometime between 2.6.15 and 2.6.17 and probably barriers are not enabled
> on a loop filesystem. Maybe the gnome vfs thing does some sync which
> force flushes or such. I'm no expert, just guessing.
>
> Just to invalidate this (probably wrong) guess, could you try to mount
> /tmp with "-o nobarrier" and re-test?
>
> Iustin, who wishes md raid1 would support barriers.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-28 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-23 15:16 Possible performance problem introduced between kernel 2.6.15 and 2.6.17 on xfs code fdegrassi
2006-12-23 15:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-12-24 0:36 ` fdegrassi
2006-12-27 15:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-12-27 18:03 ` Francesco Degrassi
2006-12-27 18:05 ` Iustin Pop
2006-12-28 9:56 ` Francesco Degrassi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459394EA.3000304@emaze.net \
--to=francesco.degrassi@emaze.net \
--cc=iusty@k1024.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox