From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:47:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l0F2l5qw007561 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:47:07 -0800 Message-ID: <45AAEB4F.6090309@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:47:43 +1100 From: Vlad Apostolov MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: dmapi vs. filesystem filter drivers References: <45AAE04A.7070003@johngroves.net> In-Reply-To: <45AAE04A.7070003@johngroves.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: jgl@johngroves.net Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com John Groves wrote: > Some time ago on this list I recall seeing some discussion of dmapi > vs. filesystem filter drivers, and I think somebody said that the > linux filesystem interface was being redesigned to provide reasonable > support for filter drivers. > > Can anybody confirm whether a filter driver interface will be > supported, and point me to more information on the status of that work? > > Thanks, > John > Hi John, Currently there is no plan for such support. Regards, Vlad