public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Klaus Strebel <klaus.strebel@gmx.net>
Cc: jamesb@loreland.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: problem with latest xfsprogs progress code
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:54:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AE46C2.6090005@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AE2DDF.5000602@gmx.net>

Klaus Strebel wrote:

>>> Running 2.8.18 xfs_repair on a largeish (65TB, ~70M inodes) filesystem on
>>> an x86_64 machine gives the following "progress" output:
>>>
>>> 12:15:36: process known inodes and inode discovery - 1461632 of 0 inod
>>> es done
>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: elapsed time 14 minutes, 32 seconds - processed 100
>>> 571 inodes per minute
>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: 0% done - estimated remaining time 3364 weeks, 3 da
>>> ys, 7 hours, 30 minutes, 45 seconds
>>>
>>> Is this a known bug?
> Hi James,
> 
> why do you think that this is a bug? You have an almost infinitely large
> filesystem, so the file-system check will also run for an almost
> infinitely long time ;-).
> 
> You see, not all that's possible is really desirable.

Well, while 65TB is impressive*, and repairing it quickly is indeed a
challenge, it probably still should not take 64+ years.  ;-)

Sounds like something is in fact going wrong.

-Eric

*it amuses me to see xfs users refer to nearly 100T as largeISH; clearly
 you all do not suffer from lowered expectations.  :)

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-17 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-16 16:30 problem with latest xfsprogs progress code James Braid
2007-01-17 11:00 ` James Braid
2007-01-17 14:08   ` Klaus Strebel
2007-01-17 15:54     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2007-01-17 22:51       ` David Chatterton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45AE46C2.6090005@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=jamesb@loreland.org \
    --cc=klaus.strebel@gmx.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox