From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Klaus Strebel <klaus.strebel@gmx.net>
Cc: jamesb@loreland.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: problem with latest xfsprogs progress code
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:54:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AE46C2.6090005@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AE2DDF.5000602@gmx.net>
Klaus Strebel wrote:
>>> Running 2.8.18 xfs_repair on a largeish (65TB, ~70M inodes) filesystem on
>>> an x86_64 machine gives the following "progress" output:
>>>
>>> 12:15:36: process known inodes and inode discovery - 1461632 of 0 inod
>>> es done
>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: elapsed time 14 minutes, 32 seconds - processed 100
>>> 571 inodes per minute
>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: 0% done - estimated remaining time 3364 weeks, 3 da
>>> ys, 7 hours, 30 minutes, 45 seconds
>>>
>>> Is this a known bug?
> Hi James,
>
> why do you think that this is a bug? You have an almost infinitely large
> filesystem, so the file-system check will also run for an almost
> infinitely long time ;-).
>
> You see, not all that's possible is really desirable.
Well, while 65TB is impressive*, and repairing it quickly is indeed a
challenge, it probably still should not take 64+ years. ;-)
Sounds like something is in fact going wrong.
-Eric
*it amuses me to see xfs users refer to nearly 100T as largeISH; clearly
you all do not suffer from lowered expectations. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-17 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-16 16:30 problem with latest xfsprogs progress code James Braid
2007-01-17 11:00 ` James Braid
2007-01-17 14:08 ` Klaus Strebel
2007-01-17 15:54 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2007-01-17 22:51 ` David Chatterton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45AE46C2.6090005@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=jamesb@loreland.org \
--cc=klaus.strebel@gmx.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox