From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.atipa.com (125.14.124.24.cm.sunflower.com [24.124.14.125]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0JLaVqw006946 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:36:32 -0800 Message-ID: <45B136D2.5080305@atipa.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:23:30 -0600 From: Roger Heflin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs-questions References: <45AF4A1A.50805@science.ru.nl> <45AFA4F6.5040806@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <45AFA4F6.5040806@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Eric Sandeen wrote: > Wim Janssen wrote: >> Hello Folks, >> >> Yesterday I downloaded from the SGI-ftpsite the module: >> kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-22.EL-0.1-1.src.rpm >> This because I like to work with the xfs-filesystem on my storage-unit. >> ( a Dell PowerEdge1950 with a MD1000-diskarray ) >> As Eric pointed out in the readme-file he tested it a bit with the >> 2.6.9-22 kernel >> and it might also work with other RHEL kernels. >> On my storage-unit I installed the 64-bit RHEL4 AS with the kernel: >> 2.6.9-42.ELsmp x86_64 > > I would suggest > http://sandeen.net/rhel4_xfs/kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL-0.2-1.src.rpm > > which is a little more up to date; see also > http://sandeen.net/rhel4_xfs/ > for more info > Eric, Very nice, it is very annoying the Redhat has a 8TB limit on filesystems. I am testing it with 2.6.9-42.0.3. Roger