From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0K33vqw012840
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:03:59 -0800
Message-ID: <45B18665.8070703@sandeen.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:03:01 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: xfs-questions
References: <45AF4A1A.50805@science.ru.nl> <45AFA4F6.5040806@sandeen.net> <45B136D2.5080305@atipa.com>
In-Reply-To: <45B136D2.5080305@atipa.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Roger Heflin <rheflin@atipa.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com

Roger Heflin wrote:

> Eric,
> 
> Very nice, it is very annoying the Redhat has a 8TB limit
> on filesystems.

Well, ext3 can do 16T now... upstream and in RHEL5 as a preview.  Feel 
free to test that too if you need a RHEL-supported solution (and if 16T 
is enough for you).

> I am testing it with 2.6.9-42.0.3.

Great, let me know if you have trouble.

Thanks,
-Eric

>                          Roger
>