From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l14Ij6qw013555 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2007 10:45:07 -0800 Message-ID: <45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:18 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Spam on list? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Justin Piszcz Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Justin Piszcz wrote: > Who runs the XFS mailing list admin-wise? A cabal... > Could we add some basic anti-spam measures, I am not subscribed to many > mailing lists but this one seems to generate the most spam. > > Any chance they'd consider switching from Sendmail -> Postfix? > > Justin. > > There are actually many spam measures in place... spamassassin, and others, but it seems they just can't keep up. The one spam measure that's not in place is subscriber-only posting. I think it may be time to revisit that decision. It's gotten really bad lately. -Eric