From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l14LlG3c009130
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:47:17 -0800
Message-ID: <45C6542D.6060803@sandeen.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:46:21 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Spam on list?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702040822520.14035@p34.internal.lan> <45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net>
In-Reply-To: <45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> There are actually many spam measures in place... spamassassin, and 
> others, but it seems they just can't keep up.

In the meantime we added another measure today, we'll see if it helps. 
I know it's bad...

Thanks,
-Eric (not the admin per se but at least the admin-pesterer)