From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 04 May 2007 07:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l44EtXfB019895 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 07:55:35 -0700 Message-ID: <463B4962.70904@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 09:55:30 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS crash on linux raid References: <20070503164521.16efe075@harpe.intellique.com> <20070504005922.GC32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070504090613.7c0f97d3@galadriel.home> <20070504073344.GL32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070504152546.614374ac@harpe.intellique.com> In-Reply-To: <20070504152546.614374ac@harpe.intellique.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:33:44 +1000 > David Chinner écrivait: > >> Well, there's your problem. Stack overflows. IMO, if you use a >> filesystem, you shouldn't use 4k stacks. ;) >> >> If you remake you kernel with 8k stacks then your problems will >> most likely go away. > > Well, I've double-checked the asm-i386/module.h, and it actually looks > like 4K stacks is NOT the default, so I must be using 8K, isn't it? Depends on how you config'd it, just look at the .config you built with, and search for CONFIG_4KSTACKS On Fedora at least (and I can't remember - I don't think this is a fedora-ism...) you can do "modinfo" on some module, and see: vermagic: 2.6.21 SMP mod_unload 686 4KSTACKS -Eric