From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 04 May 2007 22:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l455LZfB010386 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 22:21:36 -0700 Message-ID: <463C0CD8.4090402@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 23:49:28 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS crash on linux raid References: <20070503164521.16efe075@harpe.intellique.com> <20070504073344.GL32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070504152546.614374ac@harpe.intellique.com> <200705041758.21320.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20070504234357.24d22883@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20070504234357.24d22883@galadriel.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: Martin Steigerwald , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:58:21 +0200 vous écriviez: > >> Did you test with ext3 as well? You wrote it crashes with ReiserFS >> (version 3) even faster. When it crashes with several filesystems its >> unlikely to be a filesystem issue. > > Unfortunately ext3 doesn't support volumes bigger than 8TB, so that's > useless to me. I plan to test jfs, however. > I think it's more a dm/md issue, but I'm not sure... > Most recent kernels (2.6.19 or so IIRC) & cvs e2fsprogs (or that from rhel5/centos5) can do up to 16T ext3 filesystems, so you should be able to test that if you like. -Eric