From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 05 May 2007 09:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l45GlxfB005748 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 09:48:00 -0700 Message-ID: <463CB53E.8000202@sandeen.net> Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 11:47:58 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS crash on linux raid References: <20070503164521.16efe075@harpe.intellique.com> <20070504073344.GL32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070504152546.614374ac@harpe.intellique.com> <200705041758.21320.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20070504234357.24d22883@galadriel.home> <463C0CD8.4090402@sandeen.net> <20070505171820.6e92d437@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20070505171820.6e92d437@galadriel.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: Martin Steigerwald , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Fri, 04 May 2007 23:49:28 -0500 vous écriviez: > >> Most recent kernels (2.6.19 or so IIRC) & cvs e2fsprogs (or that from >> rhel5/centos5) can do up to 16T ext3 filesystems, so you should be >> able to test that if you like. > > Thanks, I'll try that too. Though it won't cover all my needs (I plan > to set up 50 and 150TB systems really soon). > Sure, I understand - it may be helpful in figuring out what the problem is, though. I'll be curious to see how it goes... Oh, btw, you'll need the -F (force) flag for mkfs.ext3 -Eric