From: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@sgi.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Review: XFSQA: unwritten extent conversion vs synchronous direct I/O
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:24:14 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464BBCCE.8080500@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070508065327.GL32602149@melbourne.sgi.com>
David Chinner wrote:
> Test to exercise synchronous direct I/O into unwritten extents.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
Would we ever want to adjust the IO_SIZE used in unwritten_sync
from the qa script?
A couple of small changes to fix compiler warnings and provide
info on dio size errors.
Otherwise looks good,
Don
Index: xfs-cmds/xfstests/src/unwritten_sync.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
-+++ xfs-cmds/xfstests/src/unwritten_sync.c 2007-05-07 11:44:38.668980258 +1000
-@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
++++ xfs-cmds/xfstests/src/unwritten_sync.c 2007-05-17 12:08:21.242781793 +1000
+@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <errno.h>
@@ -139,7 +139,9 @@
+ }
+
+ if ((dio.d_miniosz > IO_SIZE) || (dio.d_maxiosz < IO_SIZE)) {
-+ fprintf(stderr,"Test won't work. Sorry\n");
++ fprintf(stderr,"Test won't work, iosize out of range \
++ (dio.d_miniosz=%d, dio.d_maxiosz=%d)\n",
++ dio.d_miniosz, dio.d_maxiosz);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ buf = (char *)memalign(dio.d_mem , IO_SIZE);
@@ -174,23 +176,7 @@
+ print_getbmapx(file, fd, 0, 0);
+ close(fd);
+ }
-+}
-+
-+
-+
-+int
-+get_getbmapx(
-+ const char *pathname,
-+ int fd,
-+ struct getbmapx *bmapx)
-+{
-+ int rc;
-+
-+ rc = ioctl(fd, XFS_IOC_GETBMAPX, bmapx);
-+ if (rc < 0) {
-+ perror("xfs_ioc_getbmapx");
-+ exit(1);
-+ }
++ return 0;
+}
+
+void
@@ -223,8 +209,8 @@
+ if (x != array_size) {
+ break; /* end of file */
+ }
-+ if (get_getbmapx(pathname, fd, bmapx) < 0) {
-+ fprintf(stderr, "getbmapx failed\n");
++ if (xfsctl(pathname, fd, XFS_IOC_GETBMAPX, bmapx) < 0) {
++ fprintf(stderr, "XFS_IOC_GETBMAPX failed\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ if (bmapx[0].bmv_entries == 0) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-08 6:53 Review: XFSQA: unwritten extent conversion vs synchronous direct I/O David Chinner
2007-05-17 2:24 ` Donald Douwsma [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464BBCCE.8080500@sgi.com \
--to=donaldd@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs-dev@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox