From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.goop.org (gw.goop.org [64.81.55.164]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l52MsEWt000899 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:54:14 -0700 Message-ID: <4661F511.4070207@goop.org> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:54:09 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Justin Piszcz wrote: > Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in > development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch > by ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not have > any severe XFS issues? XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended by small amounts may lose their updates on umount - I see this corrupting hg repos. There's a patch which works for me, and is in 2.6.22-rc3-mm1, but it hasn't been merged upstream yet. J