From: Mike Montour <mmontour@bycast.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Allocating inodes from a single block
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:10:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469E65AF.4080003@bycast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070718035012.GA12413810@sgi.com>
David Chinner wrote:
> The issue here is not the cluster size - that is purely an in-memory
> arrangement for reading/writing muliple inodes at once. The issue
> here is inode *chunks* (as Eric pointed out).
>
> [...]
> The best you can do to try to avoid these sorts of problems is
> use the "ikeep" option to keep empty inode chunks around. That way
> if you remove a bunch of files then fragement free space you'll
> still be able to create new files until you run out of pre-allocated
> inodes....
>
What would it take to add an option to mkfs.xfs (or to create a
dedicated tool) that would efficiently[1] pre-allocate a specified
number of inode chunks when a filesystem is created? I know that XFS's
dynamic inode allocation is usually considered a "feature" relative to
filesystems like ext3, but there are cases where it's important to know
that you will not run out of inodes due to free-space fragmentation.
Note that "df -i" will still report a large number of "free inodes" when
this happens, so it's hard for a userspace application to know why it
got an error:
linux:~# df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/cciss/c0d1p1 28353238 1873216 26480022 7% /mnt
linux:~# df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/cciss/c0d1p1 429977152 377017108 52960044 88% /mnt
gn1-a-1:~# xfs_db -r /dev/cciss/c0d1p1 -c "freesp -s"
from to extents blocks pct
1 1 128231 128231 0.97
2 3 223964 555531 4.20
4 7 400255 2113089 15.97
8 15 838820 10436529 78.86
16 31 8 128 0.00
total free extents 1591278
total free blocks 13233508
average free extent size 8.31628
This filesystem was created with "-i maxpct=0,size=2048", so a new chunk
of 64 inodes would require an extent of 128 KiB (32 * 4KiB blocks).
1. "efficiently" = significantly faster than a userspace script to
'touch' a few million files and then 'rm' them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-18 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-17 18:11 Allocating inodes from a single block Michael Nishimoto
2007-07-17 20:19 ` Chris Wedgwood
2007-07-17 21:01 ` Michael Nishimoto
2007-07-18 1:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-07-18 2:01 ` Nathan Scott
2007-07-18 3:50 ` David Chinner
2007-07-18 17:53 ` Michael Nishimoto
2007-07-18 19:10 ` Mike Montour [this message]
2007-07-19 2:30 ` David Chinner
2007-07-20 1:26 ` Mike Montour
[not found] <200707231240.23425.david@fromorbit.com>
2007-07-23 5:06 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469E65AF.4080003@bycast.com \
--to=mmontour@bycast.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox