Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel

Eric Sandeen
2007-08-08T05:00:14Z

Barry Naujok wrote:

> Instead of "no flags", how about "00000" so the test doesn't break
> with xfsprogs 2.9.x and later.
>
>
[root@inode xfstests]# rpm -q xfsprogs
xfsprogs-2.9.3-1

I have that... but... whatever works :)

-Eric