From: James Pearson <james-p@moving-picture.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com, James Braid <jamesb@loreland.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46B9E98D.9070401@moving-picture.com> (raw)
>> That's odd. You have the module on the server, exporting an xfs
>> filesystem, and you're getting permission denied on the client?
>
> Yep. And rmmod'ing the updated XFS module and insmod'ing the older
> module makes it work again.
The 'stock' RHEL4/CentOS4 kernels don't have xfs modules - so, I guess
you have rebuilt your kernel with the XFS code that is there by default?
If this is the case, then this _may be_ the cause of the problem ... the
updated xfs module code uses any existing XFS configs in the kernel you
are building against - the Makefile states:
# Set up our config.
#
# If the kernel already has an XFS config, use it.
# Else if config.xfs is here, use it for our config. Otherwise,
# Else default to only CONFIG_XFS_FS=m (simplest config)
The problem is that the 'stock' 2.6.9 kernel doesn't define (or use)
CONFIG_XFS_EXPORT - but the updated xfs module code requires this to
allow NFS exports of a XFS file system ...
So my guess is that your re-built updated xfs modules don't use
CONFIG_XFS_EXPORT
I guess with a bit of hacking to the Makefile, you could force
'CONFIG_XFS_EXPORT=y' to be added - you might even be able to do this
via the rpmbuild command line ... although I don't know how.
James Pearson
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-08 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 16:04 James Pearson [this message]
2007-08-08 16:09 ` New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms Eric Sandeen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-19 19:07 Eric Sandeen
2006-12-07 17:25 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 17:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-12-07 18:17 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 23:26 ` David Chinner
2006-12-08 2:58 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 18:19 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 20:51 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 21:11 ` Nathan Scott
2006-12-07 21:35 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 21:40 ` Nathan Scott
2006-12-07 21:51 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 22:06 ` Nathan Scott
2006-12-07 22:16 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 22:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-12-07 22:25 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 22:30 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-12-07 22:52 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2006-12-07 22:53 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-12-07 23:08 ` Geir A. Myrestrand
2007-07-19 14:37 ` James Braid
2007-07-19 15:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-07-21 3:34 ` James Braid
2007-07-21 14:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-07-21 15:36 ` James Braid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46B9E98D.9070401@moving-picture.com \
--to=james-p@moving-picture.com \
--cc=jamesb@loreland.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox