* [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config
@ 2007-08-19 6:05 Eric Sandeen
2007-08-19 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-19 23:48 ` Vlad Apostolov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2007-08-19 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-oss
Defining XFS_DM_EVENT* macros to 0 in the absence of
CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI allows gcc to optimize away tests that
should never be true. Also wrap one hunk of xfs_unmount
in #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
Stack deltas on x86, gcc 4.1:
xfs_create -16
xfs_free_file_space -4
xfs_getbmap +4
xfs_link -8
xfs_mkidr -20
xfs_read -24
xfs_remove -12
xfs_rename -8
xfs_rmdir -16
xfs_setattr -20
xfs_splice_read -20
xfs_splice_write -20
xfs_unmount -48
xfs_write -20
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Index: linux-2.6.22.i386/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.i386.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
+++ linux-2.6.22.i386/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ typedef enum {
} dm_right_t;
#define HAVE_DM_RIGHT_T
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
/* Defines for determining if an event message should be sent. */
#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) ( \
unlikely ((vfsp)->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) && \
@@ -78,6 +79,11 @@ typedef enum {
( ((io)->io_dmevmask & (1 << event)) || \
((io)->io_mount->m_dmevmask & (1 << event)) ) \
)
+#else
+#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) (0)
+#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED_IO(vfsp, io, event) (0)
+#endif
+
#define DM_XFS_VALID_FS_EVENTS ( \
(1 << DM_EVENT_PREUNMOUNT) | \
Index: linux-2.6.22.i386/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.i386.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
+++ linux-2.6.22.i386/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
@@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ xfs_unmount(
rip = mp->m_rootip;
rvp = XFS_ITOV(rip);
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
if (vfsp->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) {
error = XFS_SEND_PREUNMOUNT(mp, vfsp,
rvp, DM_RIGHT_NULL, rvp, DM_RIGHT_NULL,
@@ -580,7 +581,7 @@ xfs_unmount(
unmount_event_flags = (mp->m_dmevmask & (1<<DM_EVENT_UNMOUNT))?
0 : DM_FLAGS_UNWANTED;
}
-
+#endif
/*
* First blow any referenced inode from this file system
* out of the reference cache, and delete the timer.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config
2007-08-19 6:05 [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config Eric Sandeen
@ 2007-08-19 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-19 23:48 ` Vlad Apostolov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2007-08-19 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 01:05:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Defining XFS_DM_EVENT* macros to 0 in the absence of
> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI allows gcc to optimize away tests that
> should never be true. Also wrap one hunk of xfs_unmount
> in #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
Sounds useful, especially as dmapi is not in mainline at all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config
2007-08-19 6:05 [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config Eric Sandeen
2007-08-19 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2007-08-19 23:48 ` Vlad Apostolov
2007-08-20 3:37 ` Eric Sandeen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Apostolov @ 2007-08-19 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Defining XFS_DM_EVENT* macros to 0 in the absence of
> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI allows gcc to optimize away tests that
> should never be true. Also wrap one hunk of xfs_unmount
> in #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
>
Good idea Eric. A few remarks and a question below.
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
>
CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI is only defined when the DMAPI is statically linked
to the kernel. When DMAPI is configured as a module,
CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI_MODULE
is defined. The HAVE_DMAPI is defined for both, static and module DMAPI
configurations.
> /* Defines for determining if an event message should be sent. */
> #define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) ( \
> unlikely ((vfsp)->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) && \
> @@ -78,6 +79,11 @@ typedef enum {
> ( ((io)->io_dmevmask & (1 << event)) || \
> ((io)->io_mount->m_dmevmask & (1 << event)) ) \
> )
> +#else
> +#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) (0)
>
The above should use the new two arguments DM_EVENT_ENABLED macro.
> +#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED_IO(vfsp, io, event) (0)
>
What is this DM_EVENT_ENABLE_IO macro for?
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
The same, use HAVE_DMAPI instead of CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI.
Otherwise it is looking good.
Regards,
Vlad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config
2007-08-19 23:48 ` Vlad Apostolov
@ 2007-08-20 3:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-08-20 5:22 ` Vlad Apostolov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2007-08-20 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vlad Apostolov; +Cc: xfs-oss
Vlad Apostolov wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> Defining XFS_DM_EVENT* macros to 0 in the absence of
>> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI allows gcc to optimize away tests that
>> should never be true. Also wrap one hunk of xfs_unmount
>> in #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
>>
>>
> Good idea Eric. A few remarks and a question below.
>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
>>
>>
> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI is only defined when the DMAPI is statically linked
> to the kernel. When DMAPI is configured as a module,
> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI_MODULE
> is defined. The HAVE_DMAPI is defined for both, static and module DMAPI
> configurations.
>
Hmm... ok. kernel.org doesn't have that so you'll need to take care moving this
patch to the kernel.org tree I guess.
>> /* Defines for determining if an event message should be sent. */
>> #define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) ( \
>> unlikely ((vfsp)->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) && \
>> @@ -78,6 +79,11 @@ typedef enum {
>> ( ((io)->io_dmevmask & (1 << event)) || \
>> ((io)->io_mount->m_dmevmask & (1 << event)) ) \
>> )
>> +#else
>> +#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) (0)
>>
>>
> The above should use the new two arguments DM_EVENT_ENABLED macro.
>
>> +#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED_IO(vfsp, io, event) (0)
>>
>>
> What is this DM_EVENT_ENABLE_IO macro for?
>
Ah, this is just the differernce between kernel.org & CVS I guess.
I'm just re-defining existing macros in 2.6.22.1 to no-ops.
DM_EVENT_ENABLE_IO must have been removed from CVS w/o removing from
kernel.org (yet) - and I guess same goes for the argument count.
Anyway here's a CVS patch, sorry:
------
Defining XFS_DM_EVENT* macros to 0 in the absence of
CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI allows gcc to optimize away tests that
should never be true. Also wrap one hunk of xfs_unmount
in #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
Stack deltas on x86, gcc 4.1:
xfs_create -16
xfs_free_file_space -4
xfs_getbmap +4
xfs_link -8
xfs_mkidr -20
xfs_read -24
xfs_remove -12
xfs_rename -8
xfs_rmdir -16
xfs_setattr -20
xfs_splice_read -20
xfs_splice_write -20
xfs_unmount -48
xfs_write -20
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Index: linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
+++ linux/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
@@ -67,11 +67,15 @@ typedef enum {
#define HAVE_DM_RIGHT_T
/* Defines for determining if an event message should be sent. */
+#ifdef HAVE_DMAPI
#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(ip, event) ( \
unlikely (XFS_MTOVFS((ip)->i_mount)->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) && \
( ((ip)->i_d.di_dmevmask & (1 << event)) || \
((ip)->i_mount->m_dmevmask & (1 << event)) ) \
)
+#else
+#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(ip, event) (0)
+#endif
#define DM_XFS_VALID_FS_EVENTS ( \
(1 << DM_EVENT_PREUNMOUNT) | \
Index: linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
+++ linux/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
@@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ xfs_unmount(
rip = mp->m_rootip;
rvp = XFS_ITOV(rip);
+#ifdef HAVE_DMAPI
if (vfsp->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) {
error = XFS_SEND_PREUNMOUNT(mp, vfsp,
rvp, DM_RIGHT_NULL, rvp, DM_RIGHT_NULL,
@@ -584,7 +585,7 @@ xfs_unmount(
unmount_event_flags = (mp->m_dmevmask & (1<<DM_EVENT_UNMOUNT))?
0 : DM_FLAGS_UNWANTED;
}
-
+#endif
/*
* First blow any referenced inode from this file system
* out of the reference cache, and delete the timer.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config
2007-08-20 3:37 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2007-08-20 5:22 ` Vlad Apostolov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Apostolov @ 2007-08-20 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
I ran the DMAPI QA with the updated patch and it was working fine.
I will push it in the XFS development tree.
Thanks Eric.
Regards,
Vlad
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Vlad Apostolov wrote:
>
>
>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Defining XFS_DM_EVENT* macros to 0 in the absence of
>>> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI allows gcc to optimize away tests that
>>> should never be true. Also wrap one hunk of xfs_unmount
>>> in #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Good idea Eric. A few remarks and a question below.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI is only defined when the DMAPI is statically linked
>> to the kernel. When DMAPI is configured as a module,
>> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI_MODULE
>> is defined. The HAVE_DMAPI is defined for both, static and module DMAPI
>> configurations.
>>
>>
> Hmm... ok. kernel.org doesn't have that so you'll need to take care moving this
>
> patch to the kernel.org tree I guess.
>
>
>>> /* Defines for determining if an event message should be sent. */
>>> #define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) ( \
>>> unlikely ((vfsp)->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) && \
>>> @@ -78,6 +79,11 @@ typedef enum {
>>> ( ((io)->io_dmevmask & (1 << event)) || \
>>> ((io)->io_mount->m_dmevmask & (1 << event)) ) \
>>> )
>>> +#else
>>> +#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(vfsp, ip, event) (0)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The above should use the new two arguments DM_EVENT_ENABLED macro.
>>
>>
>>> +#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED_IO(vfsp, io, event) (0)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> What is this DM_EVENT_ENABLE_IO macro for?
>>
>>
> Ah, this is just the differernce between kernel.org & CVS I guess.
> I'm just re-defining existing macros in 2.6.22.1 to no-ops.
>
> DM_EVENT_ENABLE_IO must have been removed from CVS w/o removing from
> kernel.org (yet) - and I guess same goes for the argument count.
>
> Anyway here's a CVS patch, sorry:
>
> ------
>
> Defining XFS_DM_EVENT* macros to 0 in the absence of
> CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI allows gcc to optimize away tests that
> should never be true. Also wrap one hunk of xfs_unmount
> in #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI
>
> Stack deltas on x86, gcc 4.1:
>
> xfs_create -16
> xfs_free_file_space -4
> xfs_getbmap +4
> xfs_link -8
> xfs_mkidr -20
> xfs_read -24
> xfs_remove -12
> xfs_rename -8
> xfs_rmdir -16
> xfs_setattr -20
> xfs_splice_read -20
> xfs_splice_write -20
> xfs_unmount -48
> xfs_write -20
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
>
> Index: linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
> +++ linux/fs/xfs/xfs_dmapi.h
> @@ -67,11 +67,15 @@ typedef enum {
> #define HAVE_DM_RIGHT_T
>
> /* Defines for determining if an event message should be sent. */
> +#ifdef HAVE_DMAPI
> #define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(ip, event) ( \
> unlikely (XFS_MTOVFS((ip)->i_mount)->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) && \
> ( ((ip)->i_d.di_dmevmask & (1 << event)) || \
> ((ip)->i_mount->m_dmevmask & (1 << event)) ) \
> )
> +#else
> +#define DM_EVENT_ENABLED(ip, event) (0)
> +#endif
>
> #define DM_XFS_VALID_FS_EVENTS ( \
> (1 << DM_EVENT_PREUNMOUNT) | \
> Index: linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
> +++ linux/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ xfs_unmount(
> rip = mp->m_rootip;
> rvp = XFS_ITOV(rip);
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_DMAPI
> if (vfsp->vfs_flag & VFS_DMI) {
> error = XFS_SEND_PREUNMOUNT(mp, vfsp,
> rvp, DM_RIGHT_NULL, rvp, DM_RIGHT_NULL,
> @@ -584,7 +585,7 @@ xfs_unmount(
> unmount_event_flags = (mp->m_dmevmask & (1<<DM_EVENT_UNMOUNT))?
> 0 : DM_FLAGS_UNWANTED;
> }
> -
> +#endif
> /*
> * First blow any referenced inode from this file system
> * out of the reference cache, and delete the timer.
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-20 5:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-19 6:05 [PATCH] optimize dmapi event tests w/o dmapi config Eric Sandeen
2007-08-19 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-19 23:48 ` Vlad Apostolov
2007-08-20 3:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-08-20 5:22 ` Vlad Apostolov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox