From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8ACfX4p013644 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:41:33 -0700 Message-ID: <46E53B7D.8070301@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:41:33 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Not able to register References: <46E3471D.7020408@sandeen.net> <46E35C28.4060301@sandeen.net> <20070909065143.GA6787@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> <46E409F1.4090001@agami.com> <68c491a60709090910t3bd37e7bxfec773f58a55224d@mail.gmail.com> <46E4A916.1010602@sandeen.net> <46E508E6.7010908@ventoso.org> In-Reply-To: <46E508E6.7010908@ventoso.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Luca Olivetti Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Luca Olivetti wrote: > En/na Eric Sandeen ha escrit: >> Martin Schröder wrote: >>> 2007/9/9, Michael Nishimoto : >>>> In the past when I spoke with Russell, gmail subscribes >>>> look like spam to the ecartis server. >>> Then ecartis is broken. Since it seems very stale (last released >>> version is from 2000, since then only snapshots), maybe you should >>> switch to something more vital? Mailman comes to mind... >>> >>> Best >>> Martin >>> >>> >> Ok, in Luca's case at least, it was spamassassin intercepting it... >> thought his subscribe request looked like spam. :( Looks like >> something to sort out, eh. > > Well, using bogus black lists (aren't they all bogus?) leads to that > (hint: my ip address isn't dynamic, though I strongly disagree to use > that as a criterion to decide what I'm allowed to do or not with my > connection). it wasn't a blacklist, it was about 4 other tests that tripped. > Though I find it funny that in a misguided attempt to block spam I > cannot subscribe to the list, still I can post to it :-D > >> Hm, Luca and about 130 others, from grepping the logs. > > qed no argument. I'm sure this is fixable... sorry about the problems. -Eric > Bye >