From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8AGSv4p019333 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:28:59 -0700 Message-ID: <46E570C4.6080303@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:28:52 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Attempt to Access Beyond End of Device References: <1189432747.4385.27.camel@auctoritas.fs3.ph> <46E5670E.9000703@sandeen.net> <1189439689.18040.17.camel@auctoritas.fs3.ph> In-Reply-To: <1189439689.18040.17.camel@auctoritas.fs3.ph> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Federico Sevilla III Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alec Joseph Rivera Federico Sevilla III wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:47 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> can you send along the results of: >> >> # xfs_db -r -c "sb 0" -c "print" /dev/sda8? > > Will do first thing tomorrow when I get back access to the machine, and > will revert to the list. > >> and >> # cat /proc/partitions >> >> ... and does the hardware raid have a funky sector size? > > Please advise as to how best to usually find this out. Dunno :) FWIW, the size check that is failing is simply looking at the fs geometry and trying to go out and read the last sector. -Eric