From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l8CN5R4p002517 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:05:30 -0700 Message-ID: <46E870AB.30906@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:05:15 +1000 From: Mark Goodwin Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: state of the cvs tree References: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > looks like the cvs tree is broken currently - fs/xfs/ is merged up to > 2.6.23-rc, but everything else is still at 2.6.22-rc state leading to > various compile failures. I think Tim is in the middle of the .23 update and still has some more to push in. Tim? What else do you (or anyone for that matter) have in the pipeline for XFS? Whilst we're taking huge patches and cleanups, let's get them all in asap. Thanks -- Mark Goodwin markgw@sgi.com Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP Phone: +61-3-99631937 SGI Australian Software Group Cell: +61-4-18969583 -------------------------------------------------------------