From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l8D15S4p023475 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:05:29 -0700 Message-ID: <46E88CD0.2050309@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:05:20 +1000 From: Timothy Shimmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: state of the cvs tree References: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> <46E870AB.30906@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <46E870AB.30906@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: markgw@sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Mark Goodwin wrote: > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> looks like the cvs tree is broken currently - fs/xfs/ is merged up to >> 2.6.23-rc, but everything else is still at 2.6.22-rc state leading to >> various compile failures. > > I think Tim is in the middle of the .23 update and still has some more > to push in. Tim? > No I don't :-) I did have some followup dmapi fixes but they got added yesterday. The sgi ptools 2.6.x-xfs tree seems just fine for me, is building and does have the 23-rc4 (only rc4 b/c only had kdb for that at the time) AFAICS. I guess there must be something wrong then with the cvs sync. It must be sync'ing the embedded xfs-linux tree okay but not the 2.6.x-xfs kernel tree. I'll see what I can find out. BTW, sorry for not mentioning the update on oss. I will do that next time. --Tim