From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l8D1fR4p030053
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:41:31 -0700
Message-ID: <46E89542.5040202@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:41:22 +1000
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: state of the cvs tree
References: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

Hi Christoph,

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> looks like the cvs tree is broken currently - fs/xfs/ is merged up to
> 2.6.23-rc, but everything else is still at 2.6.22-rc state leading to
> various compile failures.
> 
Looking at cvs web it looks like the 2.6.x-xfs was updated 8 hours
ago. So I am guessing that you saw a state of the tree whilst it
was doing its sync up.
Let me know if things are not fine for you still?

--Tim