From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8DEoW4p011058 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:50:33 -0700 Message-ID: <46E94E37.4030505@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:50:31 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: state of the cvs tree References: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> <46E870AB.30906@sgi.com> <20070913104000.GB3351@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20070913104000.GB3351@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mark Goodwin , xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Then I have a patch from Eric sitting in the front of my queue, > > "[PATCH V2] refactor xfs_mountfs for clarity & stack savings" > > which might be a little too big for 2.6.24, but should at least go into > CVS ASAP. I think Eric would be really happy to see it in 2.6.24 aswell > because that means FC8 could actually mount xfs out of the box without > running out of stack or something. Yes ;-) I've got that patch in Fedora now, but it'd be great to have it come via upstream. -Eric