From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8JKTquw007823 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:29:54 -0700 Message-ID: <46F186A7.7050301@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:29:27 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill XFS_INOBT_IS_FREE_DISK References: <20070919161202.GA18130@lst.de> <46F16752.1090702@sandeen.net> <20070919202239.GA32475@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20070919202239.GA32475@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> HAVE_SPLICE > > > Backward compat? ah, yeah, it's for 2.4: 0 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 104 #define HAVE_SPLICE 1 fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 4718 #ifdef HAVE_SPLICE can probably go soon eh. HAVE_PERCPU_SB can too (not sure why it's not in my list) There may be others that are just for 2.4. > >> nested_spinlock >> nested_spinunlock > > don't your patches kill these? yeah, I just checked pristine cvs. -Eric