From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l8NM6FQ3002329 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:06:17 -0700 Message-ID: <46F6E344.20907@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:05:56 +1000 From: Mark Goodwin Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] Restore ihashsize mount option as deprecated References: <20070809114548.GG12413810@sgi.com> <46F4390A.5070407@sandeen.net> <20070923075756.GP995458@sgi.com> <20070923100039.GA5370@infradead.org> <46F67BD3.8050706@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <46F67BD3.8050706@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , David Chinner , xfs-dev , xfs-oss , trev , "Kevin G. Snow" Eric Sandeen wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Did anyone but Dave get Eric's original message? It seems to not have >> made it to the list. >> > > No, it was yet another lost email on oss. I guess the xfs-dev list got it. > >>>From a fairly quick look at logs I have no idea what happened... but > this is clearly a problem that must be solved one way or another. Have we (or can we) agree on a new list handler? The current mechanism has trouble allowing new subscribers and now we see it's loosing mail too. Let's get this fixed and move on. Who owns this on oss? If nobody, then I'll organize it, but first we need consensus on a replacement. Thanks -- Mark Goodwin markgw@sgi.com Engineering Manager for XFS and PCP Phone: +61-3-99631937 SGI Australian Software Group Cell: +61-4-18969583 -------------------------------------------------------------