From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8NMc0Q3007654
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:38:00 -0700
Message-ID: <46F6EACA.5040607@sandeen.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:38:02 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] Restore ihashsize mount option as deprecated
References: <20070809114548.GG12413810@sgi.com> <46F4390A.5070407@sandeen.net> <20070923075756.GP995458@sgi.com> <20070923100039.GA5370@infradead.org> <46F67BD3.8050706@sandeen.net> <46F6E344.20907@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <46F6E344.20907@sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: markgw@sgi.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, trev <trev@sgi.com>, "Kevin G. Snow" <kgsnow@sgi.com>

Mark Goodwin wrote:
> 
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Did anyone but Dave get Eric's original message?  It seems to not have
>>> made it to the list.
>>>
>> No, it was yet another lost email on oss.  I guess the xfs-dev list got it.
>>
>> >From a fairly quick look at logs I have no idea what happened... but
>> this is clearly a problem that must be solved one way or another.
> 
> Have we (or can we) agree on a new list handler? The current mechanism
> has trouble allowing new subscribers 

That appeared to be spamfilter misfires.

> and now we see it's loosing mail
> too. 

Not sure anyone has gotten to the bottom of this new problem.

-Eric

> Let's get this fixed and move on. Who owns this on oss? If nobody,
> then I'll organize it, but first we need consensus on a replacement.
> 
> Thanks
>