From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8P1WtQ3020978 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:32:57 -0700 Message-ID: <46F8654B.9010203@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:32:59 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: something very strange w/ filestreams... References: <46F49C80.60007@sandeen.net> <20070923092444.GQ995458@sgi.com> <46F7B04D.70809@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Barry Naujok Cc: David Chinner , xfs-oss Barry Naujok wrote: >>> So, before running this test, you should make sure your test >>> partitions are completely zeroed from mkfs's that occurred >>> before that recent version of mkfs.xfs was installed. >> I dd'd over the whole test partition, ran the sequence, and hit the >> problem. > > Yeah, worked it out yesterday but never got around to doing another > email. It's a combination of the two filestreams tests which do > small filesystems and mkfs.xfs doesn't wipe beyond the new > filesystem size. Zero the disk, try the attached patch and see > if that fixes the problem. > > Barry. Ok, but what about that double free? -Eric