From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l8R0pL2G024736 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:51:25 -0700 Received: from cxfsmac10.melbourne.sgi.com (cxfsmac10.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.100]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA21853; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:50:57 +1000 Message-ID: <46FAFE71.9070000@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:50:57 +1000 From: Donald Douwsma MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: PARTIAL TAKE 971050 - Remove linux-2.4 build support References: <20070926082614.D92CE300F406@linuxbuild.melbourne.sgi.com> <46FA4FA5.5040405@sandeen.net> <20070926122854.GA17050@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20070926122854.GA17050@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:25:09AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> So, what's to be done about xfs_refcache.c... right now it's 2.4-only, >> but i'm not convinced that there is similar generic nfs functionality in >> 2.6, anyone know for sure? > > We keep the inodes around through nfsd, yes. There's a slight problem > with ->release beeing called to early, but Greg is working on fixing > that using an open files cache in nfsd. Cool I'll keep that in mind, I'm going to remove support/Makefile which is 2.4 specific as well. Are there any other 2.4 isms you guys know of? Don